https://www.hinduhistory.info/language-wars-aryan-vs-dravidian/ Wed, 09 Dec 2015 07:04:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.16 https://www.hinduhistory.info/language-wars-aryan-vs-dravidian/#comment-42324 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 07:04:43 +0000 http://www.hinduhistory.info/?p=1232#comment-42324 good

]]> https://www.hinduhistory.info/language-wars-aryan-vs-dravidian/#comment-34577 Mon, 02 Mar 2015 03:11:30 +0000 http://www.hinduhistory.info/?p=1232#comment-34577 IF the Dravidians were not the original inhabitants of India, cant understand why they are all the way in the south and the North Indians are only in the north. The Dravidians could not have come into India by any other way other from the North.
If the so called Aryans were were ‘indians’, they should have been all over india including South evenly distributed. And being a larger built people, there should be more of them and more widespread.
Harappa and Indus ruins have evidence of Dravidian gods and ancient writings and artifacts.
Genetic analysis literature shows no significant difference between the populations in the north or south.
However as we move west into Punjab, Afghanistan and Persia we see a gradual change in features to more Aryan type of people, less common in North India and absent in South India.
It is like the confluence of a river: the Dravidians were in India and as the Aryans flowed into Dravidian India, genetic integration took place forming the North Indians. As we go west into Pakistan, Afghanistan etc , more of the people have features of so called Aryans.
You can see the same pattern of migration further to South East Asia and Australia. Today there are Europeans in Australia. Does not mean they came into Australia along with the Australian natives!!

]]>